If I can't do something one way, I'll try another. I'm not proud. I've had a block for the past two weeks against doing Picture Envy in the traditional, once-a-week, at least three photos per week format. I'm going to try and break it down into a more daily, individualized process for a while. Today, I woke up extra-special-early (05:15 instead of my usual 7:00), so I have time to give it a shot.
Pixel@Day, Sailboat, Chicago, Il. (Jun. 3, 2005).
When I first saw the top photo of the three linked above (the color photo of the sailboat's rigging), I made a comment on Pixel@Day, asking the author, Jean-René Geoffrion, if he had considered processing the photo in black & white. I was thinking of photos I had taken that had come out feeling chaotic because color's presence gave the eye too much to take in. I was also thinking of how many photobloggers mention that the "that's great" comments are nice, but they desire constructive criticism as well. Truthfully, I do too, and so, at the time I made my comment, I was thinking about doing just that.
JR humored me (he's a pro, and I'm sure was thinking "who the hell is this twerp"), and produced two different images, one with a stylized color processing and the other in b&w. This is a neat opportunity, then, to look at one image presented three different ways for the way color helps and hurts a shot.
In the original, top shot, JR brings out the cast of the clouds pretty well. They're dark. They're foreboding. When I had made my suggestion, the storyteller in me wanted them to be more foreboding. I think that comes out in the second, highly-post-processed image. However, some of the detail in the ropes is lost in the second image. It's a trade-off for the impressionistic tone, and it's a good trade-off. The b&w - the one I suggested - actually doesn't bring out the clouds as well as the color shots, probably because of the loss of warmth when the golden color of the wood is stripped away. In other words: I was dead wrong in my suggestion.
I've been reading Freeman Patterson's Photographing the World Around You: A Visual Design Workshop for Film and Digital Photography. I pick up a lot of these "how-to" books because I have never taken a class on photography and I hope to learn something new, something that will improve my style (that's why I want the constructive criticism here as well). Patterson spent a chapter discussing lines in photos in a fashion that could be described as neurological. The brain interprets vertical, horizontal, and diagonal lines in a certain fashion, with each representing something. Vertical lines not only provide definition to an image (as we tend to look at them as dividers) but also strength (think of the bars of a prison). Diagonals provide a sense of movement or decay (as in a vertical line that is losing its strength). JR has a lot of movement in his shot because he allowed the rigging and mast of the sailboat to hold a diagonal position. The b&w shot captures this with the most clarity. The impressionistic shot, though, does it with such power - through the stylized post-development color editing - that I think I was wrong to suggest the change to b&w. The color was more critical than the forms upon which I focused.
Recent Comments