The Doctor, Cattus Island County Park, Dover Tp., New Jersey.
It's been a bit of a week for me. Lots of difficult decisions made of the "let's redefine life" sort. I'm not sure what will come of it all, but I'm hopeful and scared, so it is definitely going to be interesting.
The New York Times has an interesting article on the growing relationship between two great museums of photography, The George Eastman House in Rochester, New York, and the International Center of Photography in New York, New York, and their development of an online exhibit at www.photomuse.org. Unfortunately, I keep getting a "connection refused" message when I try to link to photomuse.org. I assume that this is due to the glut of people trying to check it out from the NY Times. I'm interested to see what the site will have on there. NYT explains the online project thusly:
... an ambitious project to
create one of the largest freely accessible databases of masterwork
photography anywhere on the Web, a venture that will bring their
collections to much greater public notice and provide an immense
resource for photography aficionados, both scholars and amateurs.
The Web site - Photomuse.org,
now active only as a test site, with a smattering of images - is
expected to include almost 200,000 photographs when it is completed in
the fall of 2006, and as both institutions work out agreements with
estates and living photographers, the intention is to add tens of
thousands more pictures.
Randy Kennedy, Amassing a Treasury of Photography, N.Y. Times (Jul. 20, 2005).
I checked out some of the photos attached to the article (in lieu of visiting the site); they're impressive works (Capa, Stieglitz, and Brady are amongst those represented). If Photomuse is going to head down that road, it could be a hell of an inspiration.
Javanrouh is one of the bigger photobloggers out there, and that's for a reason: he has a good eye. I enjoy the precision of this shot. There's nearly perfect symmetry going on, which is something that the human eye is drawn toward (in fact, there are those that think that the biological notion of physical attractiveness is based on the symmetry of faces).
BCE Christmas Lights also has a silvery tone that I like. I watched (for the fourth or fifth time) my copy of The American Experience: Ansel Adams. Adams was great with black & white film. Perhaps the greatest (well, either him or Stieglitz). Adams could draw a certain shimmering tone that really changed the way we look at the American West. Having seen some of the places he photographed, Adams did a lot to change the way the places actually appeared in his work. Golden mountains take on a white, papery tone. Pale green aspens become tinsel. That tonal change is pretty impressive, as is the tonal qualities of BCE Christmas Lights. There's a gradient to the tone in this work that furthers the sense of order therein.
This week's Carnival of the New Jersey Bloggers is up and raring. There's some great shots on it that reference some of my favorite NJ architecture. As always, link early and link often.
The matter of United States v. Berger, 1:05-mj-00175-DAR-ALL, venued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ("DDC")is not my normal subject matter, as I don't often post on law - if at all, these days - but is one of great interest to me since it's being prosecuted by the counterintelligence division of the Department of Justice. On Instapundit, Pr. Reynolds posted that many are wondering why Berger, the former National Security Advisor to Clinton accused of violating various national security acts with his alleged misdeeds at the National Archives, has yet to be sentenced (apparently he was previously scheduled to be sentenced on July 8, 2005).
I reviewed PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records, the nationwide electronic database of Federal pleadings, orders, and opinions) for DDC and pulled up the docket report for Sandy Berger's case. Berger was to be sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement set up on April 1, 2005 (I'll leave the April Fool's Day witticisms to you) with USDOJ that apparently had cooperation with the National Archives on some other matter as a condition of the plea. Berger's cooperation is apparently still ongoing, and therefore the USDOJ requested, without opposition by the defendant, an adjournment of sentencing until August 24, 2005. During that time, according to the USDOJ motion (attached hereto as berger.pdf), Berger will wrap up his cooperation (I imagine that Berger's cooperation will take the form of explaining how NARA missed the top secret documents hanging out of Berger's "gold toes"). For further information, I've also attached hereto Berger's Factual Proffer (bergerproffer.pdf), submitted pursuant to the plea agreement.
As a side note, I love PACER. It's a great resource for lawyers to use to learn their practice. I often will check out briefs in other cases just to improve my practice, plus, in my own cases, I can keep track of every pleading ever filed without a waste of paper.
An unnamed source told me that I might get Insta-linked on this post. That being the case, please feel free to look around. I used to do a lot more writing (as with this photoessay, independence day), but am now mostly devoted to photography, particular of the coasts of New York and New Jersey (I have the Quixotic goal of showing that Jersey is not as ugly as it's made out to be). Here's a link to those photos. If you're into photography, though, you really should check out the following three other photoblogs (first mostly reviewed in my Picture Envy posts):
Mute - I haven't gotten to Mute yet, but this post makes me realize that I need to do so soon.
Update 2: "How's that for a slice of fried gold?*"
Holy crapola. In the last hour, I've received 2,000 more hits than
I normally receive per week. Thanks to all the Instapundit visitors
for stopping by. Please feel free to embark on a political firestorm
in the comments (just mind the furniture, if you would be so kind; that
piece over there is an authentic late century ikea.... oh hell, bash it
to particle board dust).
Thanks also to Conservative Outpost, which links to united states v. berger in its response to the Karl Rove matter. In another post, Conservative Outpost quotes a powerfully convincing speech from Sen. Cornyn, R-TX, a former District Court Judge and Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Texas, on the confirmation process for the successor to Associate Justice O'Connor. I love these glimmers of thoughtful political rhetoric that surface now and then, regardless of the politics of those who utter them. It makes me long for the days when statesmen wrote/spoke as well as Lincoln, the Roosevelts, or the last funny president, Calvin Coolidge. I will take issue with one part of Sen. Cornyn's speech, however.
Judges in our Federal system do not make law, or I should say are
not supposed to make law. The laws are made for them and indeed for the
entire Nation by the people's representatives in the form of statutes
enacted by the Congress and in the form of the Constitution that we the
people have ratified to govern our affairs. These are legal texts and
they are supposed to tie the hands of judges in our system. Judges in
our system are not supposed to make up the law as they go along. They
are simply supposed to apply the laws made by the people to the facts
If the law is to change, it is because the people are the ones who
are supposed to change it, not because judges do. Federal judges,
again, have no general common law-making power.
This is technically inaccurate. A situation could arise where a matter is brought before a federal district court due to that court's diversity jurisdiction (which, prior to Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), was a federal common law question) or federal question jurisdiction that is based on or includes a question of common law liability. Negligence is a classic common law question - was there a breach of a duty to endeavor to act in due care that was the proximate cause of an injury - that could arise in a federal court by virtue of diversity jurisdiction (heck, Erie itself was a negligence case). I'm guessing this is probably more relevant when addressing federal cases where the federal laws concerning longshoremen or mariners keeps the case out of state court, but, nonetheless, there are federal common law questions. Most of the time, federal courts will follow the law of the state, but there are instances where I can imagine that a question of first impression - one that no court has ruled on - goes before a federal judge before it goes before a state judge. In such an instance, there would necessarily be a federal common law decision.
In any event, here's to hoping that the next associate justice is a legal scholar. Get someone "wicked smart," as they say. Why not Posner? Why not former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White? U.S. District Court Judge Martini (a former congressman)? William Weld (an amazing mind, based on my personal interactions with him)? Hey, if you want to go leftist, why not Bill Bradley (another immensely smart man)?
Infidel Cowboy gets a little Hunter S. Thompson-esque in his "isn't his funny" line of thinking.
I'm happy to see that the Carnival of New Jersey bloggers is being reported on in the New York Times. Suzette, Prop, Barista, and others have some cool stuff worth noticing (of course, noticing Barista only serves to expand the Bloomfield empire.... something I find frightening). Incidentally, Prop was already famous:
The Glorious Leader is a man of the people. (C) Fiends of Prop 2008, Inc. (no matter what Pops says....)
Why wasn't I in the article? I was at the bar, of course.